Samsung Galaxy A03 Core vs Oppo Realme C30

VS Samsung Galaxy A03 Core Oppo Realme C30

Here we compared two budget smartphones: the 6.5-inch Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (with Unisoc SC9863A) that was released on November 15 2021 against the Oppo Realme C30 which is powered by Unisoc Tiger T612 and came out 8 months after. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.

1. Differences
2. Review
3. Specs
4. Benchmarks
5. Battery life
6. Camera
7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core

• The front-facing camera can record video at 1080p

Reasons to consider the Oppo Realme C30

• 56% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (180K versus 116K)
• Newer Bluetooth version (v5)
• Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR4X
• More energy-efficient CPU – Unisoc Tiger T612
• Faster storage type - UFS 2.2 versus eMMC 5.1
• 2.4x faster in single-core GeekBench 5 test: 350 and 147 points
• The phone is 8-months newer
• Weighs 29 grams less

Review

Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness Galaxy A03 Core 58 Realme C30 61 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Galaxy A03 Core 16 Realme C30 26 Battery Battery life charging type and speed Galaxy A03 Core 65 Realme C30 70 Camera Photo and video recording quality Galaxy A03 Core 43 Realme C30 44 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission Galaxy A03 Core 49 Realme C30 58 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Galaxy A03 Core 46 Realme C30 51

Value for money

You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Samsung Galaxy A03 Core Price Oppo Realme C30 Calculate

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: Galaxy A03 Core vs Realme C30

Display

Type	PLS TFT	IPS LCD
Size	6.5 inches	6.5 inches
Resolution	720 x 1600 pixels	720 x 1600 pixels
Aspect ratio	20:9	20:9
PPI	270 ppi	270 ppi
Refresh rate	60 Hz	60 Hz
Max rated brightness	450 nits	400 nits
HDR support	No	No
Screen protection	Tempered glass	Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio	81.8%	82.2%

Design and build

Height	164.2 mm (6.46 inches)	164.1 mm (6.46 inches)
Width	75.9 mm (2.99 inches)	75.6 mm (2.98 inches)
Thickness	9.1 mm (0.36 inches)	8.5 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight	211 gramm (7.44 oz)	182 gramm (6.42 oz)
Waterproof	No	No
Rear material	Plastic	Plastic
Frame material	Plastic	Plastic
Colors	Black Blue	Black Blue Green
Fingerprint scanner	No	No

Screen-to-body ratio Galaxy A03 Core 81.8% Realme C30 82.2%

Performance

Tests of Samsung Galaxy A03 Core and Oppo Realme C30 in the benchmarks

SoC

Chipset	Unisoc SC9863A	Unisoc Tiger T612
Max. clock	1600 MHz	1800 MHz
CPU cores	8 (4 + 4)	8 (2 + 6)
Architecture	- 4 cores at 1.2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 1.6 GHz: Cortex-A55	- 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A75
Lithography process	28 nanometers	12 nanometers
Graphics	PowerVR GE8322	Mali-G57 MP1
GPU clock	-	614 MHz

Memory

RAM size	2 GB	2 3 GB
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR4X
Channels	1	2

Storage

Storage size	32 GB	32 64 GB
Storage type	eMMC 5.1	UFS 2.2
Memory card	MicroSD	MicroSD
Memory card max. size	Up to 1024 GB	Up to 1024 GB

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Galaxy A03 Core 147 Realme C30 +138% 350 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Galaxy A03 Core 760 Realme C30 +72% 1307 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Galaxy A03 Core 116058 Realme C30 +56% 180854

CPU	-	59874
GPU	-	21805
Memory	-	45664
UX	-	52407
Total score	116058	180854

3DMark Wild Life Performance Galaxy A03 Core n/a Realme C30 412

PCMark 3.0 score

-

7400

Sources: 3DMark [3] ▶️ Submit your AnTuTu result

Software

Operating system	Android 11	Android 11
ROM	One UI Core 3.1	Realme UI Go
OS size	8.8 GB	-

Battery

Specifications

Capacity	5000 mAh	5000 mAh
Charge power	10 W	10 W
Battery type	Li-Ion	Li-Po
Replaceable	Yes	No
Wireless charging	No	No
Reverse charging	No	No
Fast charging	No	No
Full charging time	2:50 hr	2:55 hr

Camera

Specs and camera test of smartphones

Main camera

Matrix	8 megapixels	8 megapixels
Image resolution	3264 x 2448	3264 x 2448
Zoom	Digital	Digital
Flash	LED	LED
Stabilization	Digital	Digital
8K video recording	No	No
4K video recording	No	No
1080p video recording	Up to 30FPS	Up to 30FPS
Slow motion	No	No
Lenses	1 (8 MP)	1 (8 MP)
Wide (main) lens	- 8 MP - Aperture: f/2.0 - Phase autofocus	- 8 MP - Aperture: f/2.0 - Focal length: 27 mm - Sensor: 1/4.0" (CMOS)

Selfie camera

Megapixels	5 megapixels	5 megapixels
Image resolution	2560 x 1920	2560 x 1960
Aperture	f/2.2	f/2.2
Focal length	-	27 mm
Sensor type	CMOS	CMOS
Sensor size	-	1/5.0"
Video resolution	1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS	720p at 30 FPS

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n)	Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
Wi-Fi features	- Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display	- Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version	4.2	5
Bluetooth features	LE A2DP	LE
USB type	Micro USB	Micro USB
USB version	2	2
USB features	- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG	- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG
GPS	GPS GLONASS Beidou	GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo
NFC*	No	No
Infrared port	No	No

Network

Number of SIM*	2	2
Type of SIM card	Nano	Nano
Multi SIM mode	Standby	Standby
eSIM support*	No	No
Hybrid slot	No	No
LTE Cat*	4	7
5G support	No	No

Sound

Speakers	Mono	Mono
Headphone audio jack	Yes	Yes
FM radio	-	Yes
Dolby Atmos	No	No

Other

Category	Budget	Budget
Announced	November 2021	July 2022
Release date	December 2021	July 2022
SAR (head)	0.24 W/kg	-
SAR (body)	1.39 W/kg	-
Sensors	- Proximity sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor	- Proximity sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor

*Disclaimer! NFC GSM network support and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data we think that the Oppo Realme C30 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So which phone would you choose? Samsung Galaxy A03 Core 3 (33.3%) Oppo Realme C30 6 (66.7%) Vote Total votes: 9

Related comparisons

1. Xiaomi Redmi 9A or Samsung Galaxy A03 Core 2. Samsung Galaxy A03 or A03 Core 3. Oppo Realme C25 or Realme C30 4. Xiaomi Poco C31 or Oppo Realme C30 5. Oppo Realme C35 or Realme C30

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Send

source nanoreview.net

Android Samsung Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave


Samsung Refrigerators 4 door with touch screen


Blur Phone Wallpaper 1080x2340 - 111


UnBricking TV by EEPROM Reset - SamyGO


25 amazing Italian bathroom tile designs ideas and pictures 2020


Samsung Galaxy A32 Wallpapers HD


Samsung Wave 723 Hintergrundbilder


2014 Most Beautiful Object in South Africa Design Indaba

Share On: Facebook Twitter Google+

Xiaomi 12 Lite vs Xiaomi 12

VS Xiaomi 12 Lite Xiaomi 12

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.55-inch Xiaomi 12 Lite (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G) that was released on July 9 2022 against the Xiaomi 12 which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and came out 7 months before. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.

1. Differences
2. Review
3. Specs
4. Benchmarks
5. Battery life
6. Camera
7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 12 Lite

• Water-resistant body (IP53 classification)
• Shows 10% longer battery life (28:08 vs 25:34 hours)
• The phone is 7-months newer

Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 12

• 83% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (966K versus 527K)
• Supports wireless charging up to 50W
• Optical image stabilization
• Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5 3200 MHz
• Delivers 9% higher peak brightness (904 against 828 nits)
• Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS

Review

Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness 12 Lite 90 Xiaomi 12 90 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games 12 Lite 63 Xiaomi 12 93 Battery Battery life charging type and speed 12 Lite 72 Xiaomi 12 74 Camera Photo and video recording quality 12 Lite 66 Xiaomi 12 76 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission 12 Lite 87 Xiaomi 12 84 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation 12 Lite 75 Xiaomi 12 82

Value for money

You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Xiaomi 12 Lite Price Xiaomi 12 Calculate

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: 12 Lite vs Xiaomi 12

Display

Type	AMOLED	AMOLED
Size	6.55 inches	6.28 inches
Resolution	1080 x 2400 pixels	1080 x 2400 pixels
Aspect ratio	20:9	20:9
PPI	402 ppi	419 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Max rated brightness	500 nits	500 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR	950 nits	1100 nits
HDR support	Yes HDR10+	Yes HDR10+
Screen protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	Gorilla Glass Victus
Screen-to-body ratio	88.2%	89.2%
Display features	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming

Display tests

RGB color space	98.8%	-
PWM	119 Hz	-
Response time	1 ms	-
Contrast	∞ Infinity	-

Peak brightness test (auto) 12 Lite 828 nits Xiaomi 12 +9% 904 nits Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height	159.3 mm (6.27 inches)	152.7 mm (6.01 inches)
Width	73.7 mm (2.9 inches)	69.9 mm (2.75 inches)
Thickness	7.29 mm (0.29 inches)	8.16 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight	173 gramm (6.1 oz)	180 gramm (6.35 oz)
Waterproof	IP53	No
Rear material	Glass	Glass
Frame material	Plastic	Metal
Colors	Black Green Pink	Black Blue Pink
Fingerprint scanner	Yes in-display	Yes in-display

Screen-to-body ratio 12 Lite 88.2% Xiaomi 12 +1% 89.2%

Performance

Tests of Xiaomi 12 Lite and Xiaomi 12 in the benchmarks

SoC

Chipset	Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G	Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Max. clock	2400 MHz	3000 MHz
CPU cores	8 (1 + 3 + 4)	8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture	- 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 3 cores at 2.2 GHz: Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78) - 1 core at 2.4 GHz: Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)	- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A710 - 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-X2
L3 cache	-	6 MB
Lithography process	6 nanometers	4 nanometers
Graphics	Adreno 642L	Adreno 730
GPU clock	490 MHz	818 MHz
FLOPS	-	~2236 GFLOPS

Memory

RAM size	6 8 GB	8 12 GB
Memory type	LPDDR4X	LPDDR5
Memory clock	2133 MHz	3200 MHz
Channels	2	2

Storage

Storage size	128 256 GB	128 256 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 3.1
Memory card	No	No

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) 12 Lite 792 Xiaomi 12 +58% 1252 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) 12 Lite 2967 Xiaomi 12 +30% 3850 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 12 Lite 527767 Xiaomi 12 +83% 966255

CPU	156945	218182
GPU	156503	399246
Memory	83173	171958
UX	127468	170121
Total score	527767	966255

3DMark Wild Life Performance 12 Lite n/a Xiaomi 12 9069

Stability	-	57%
Graphics test	-	54 FPS
Graphics score	-	9069
PCMark 3.0 score	-	13099

AnTuTu Rating Sources: 3DMark [3] ▶️ Submit your AnTuTu result

Software

Operating system	Android 12	Android 12
ROM	MIUI 13	MIUI 13
OS size	24.7 GB	-

Battery

Specifications

Capacity	4300 mAh	4500 mAh
Charge power	67 W	67 W
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Replaceable	No	No
Wireless charging	No	Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging	No	Yes (wireless)
Fast charging	Yes (50% in 15 min)	Yes (87% in 30 min)
Full charging time	0:50 hr	0:46 hr

Battery life tests

Web browsing	09:39 hr	09:04 hr
Watching video	13:26 hr	13:03 hr
Gaming	05:12 hr	04:49 hr
Standby	86 hr	70 hr

General battery life 12 Lite +10% 28:08 hr Xiaomi 12 25:34 hr

Camera

Specs and camera test of smartphones

Main camera

Matrix	108 megapixels	50 megapixels
Image resolution	12000 x 9000	8700 x 5800
Zoom	Digital	Digital
Flash	LED	Dual LED
Stabilization	Digital	Optical
8K video recording	No	Up to 24FPS
4K video recording	Up to 30FPS	Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording	Up to 60FPS	Up to 60FPS
Slow motion	960 FPS (720p)	1920 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens	120°	123°
Lenses	3 (108 MP + 8 MP + 2 MP)	3 (50 MP + 13 MP + 5 MP)
Wide (main) lens	- 108 MP - Aperture: f/1.9 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 0.7 micron - Sensor: 1/1.52" Samsung S5KHM2 (ISOCELL Plus CMOS) - Phase autofocus	- 50 MP - Aperture: f/1.9 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 1 micron - Sensor: 1/1.56" Sony IMX766 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) - Optical stabilization
Ultra-wide lens	- 8 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 13 mm - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/4" (CMOS)	- 13 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/3.06" OmniVision OV13B10 (CMOS)
Macro lens	- 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 - Focal length: 50 mm - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/5" (CMOS) - Phase autofocus	- 5 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 - Focal length: 50 mm - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization
Camera features	- Bokeh mode - Pro mode	- Bokeh mode - Pro mode
Samples	-	Photo samples of Xiaomi 12 from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels	32 megapixels	32 megapixels
Image resolution	6528 x 4896	6528 x 4896
Aperture	f/2.5	f/2.4
Focal length	27 mm	26 mm
Pixel size	0.8 microns	0.7 microns
Sensor type	CMOS	CMOS
Sensor size	1/2.8"	-
Video resolution	1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS	1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS

DxOMark camera tests

Photo quality 12 Lite n/a Xiaomi 12 131 Video quality 12 Lite n/a Xiaomi 12 95 Generic camera score 12 Lite n/a Xiaomi 12 123

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax)	Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version	5.2	5.2
Bluetooth features	LE HID A2DP	LE
USB type	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
USB features	- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG	- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG
GPS	GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo QZSS NAVIC	GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo NAVIC
NFC*	Yes	Yes
Infrared port	Yes	Yes

Network

Number of SIM*	2	2
Type of SIM card	Nano	Nano
Multi SIM mode	Standby	Standby
eSIM support*	No	No
Hybrid slot	No	No
LTE Cat*	20	20
5G support	Yes	Yes

Sound

Speakers	Stereo	Stereo
Headphone audio jack	No	No
FM radio	No	No
Dolby Atmos	Yes	Yes

Speakers test Max. loudness 12 Lite 89.7 dB Xiaomi 12 n/a

Other

Category	Mid-range	Flagship
Announced	July 2022	December 2021
Release date	July 2022	December 2021
Sensors	- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint	- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint

*Disclaimer! NFC GSM network support and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data we think that the Xiaomi 12 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So which phone would you choose? Xiaomi 12 Lite 79 (50.6%) Xiaomi 12 77 (49.4%) Vote Total votes: 156

Related comparisons

1. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro or Xiaomi 12 Lite 2. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro (Global) or Xiaomi 12 Lite 3. Apple iPhone 12 mini or Xiaomi 12 Lite 4. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G or Xiaomi 12 Lite 5. Apple iPhone 13 or Xiaomi 12 6. Xiaomi 11T or Xiaomi 12 7. Samsung Galaxy S22 or Xiaomi 12 8. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra or Xiaomi 12 9. Xiaomi 12T Pro or Xiaomi 12

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Send

source nanoreview.net

Xiaomi introduced affordable flagships Mi 11X and Mi 11X Pro - powerful


The rise of the 400 smartphone you want how much for a flagship Ars


Xiaomi Verkocht 18 7 Miljoen Telefoons In 2013 - Androidics nl


Xiaomi Launches Online Portal - Investing co uk


Xiaomi


Xiaomi Archives - Techkalauz


Xiaomi was officially removed from US Blacklist TechAlert24


XIAOMI - Quickmobile


Xiaomi Mi 11 Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave


XIAOMI


Opaska Mi Band 5 - Xiaomi AZE Tech


Huawei Magazine Wallpaper 091 - 1440x2560


Waves Phone Wallpaper 039 - 1080x2340


Fall Phone Wallpaper - 008


Autumn Phone Wallpaper - 062


Cloud Phone Wallpaper 1440x2560 - 014


Apple iPhone X Wallpapers HD

Share On: Facebook Twitter Google+

Vivo Y35 vs Vivo V25e

VS Vivo Y35 Vivo V25e

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.58-inch Vivo Y35 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 680) that was released on September 15 2022 against the Vivo V25e which is powered by MediaTek Helio G99 and came out 1 month before. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.

1. Differences
2. Review
3. Specs
4. Benchmarks
5. Battery life
6. Camera
7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Vivo Y35

• Comes with 500 mAh larger battery capacity: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
• Reverse charging feature
• Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port

Reasons to consider the Vivo V25e

• Newer Bluetooth version (v5.2)
• Optical image stabilization
• 28% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (336K versus 262K)
• AMOLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
• 44% faster in single-core GeekBench 5 test: 541 and 377 points

Review

Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness Vivo Y35 76 Vivo V25e 83 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Vivo Y35 39 Vivo V25e 49 Battery Battery life charging type and speed Vivo Y35 84 Vivo V25e 80 Camera Photo and video recording quality Vivo Y35 62 Vivo V25e 67 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission Vivo Y35 74 Vivo V25e 79 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Vivo Y35 65 Vivo V25e 69

Value for money

You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Vivo Y35 Price Vivo V25e Calculate

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: Vivo Y35 vs Vivo V25e

Display

Type	IPS LCD	AMOLED
Size	6.58 inches	6.44 inches
Resolution	1080 x 2408 pixels	1080 x 2404 pixels
Aspect ratio	20:9	20:9
PPI	401 ppi	409 ppi
Refresh rate	90 Hz	90 Hz
Max rated brightness	500 nits	500 nits
HDR support	No	-
Screen protection	Tempered glass	Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio	83.4%	84.7%
Display features	-	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display

Design and build

Height	164.3 mm (6.47 inches)	159.2 mm (6.27 inches)
Width	76.1 mm (3 inches)	74.2 mm (2.92 inches)
Thickness	8.28 mm (0.33 inches)	7.79 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight	188 gramm (6.63 oz)	183 gramm (6.46 oz)
Waterproof	-	IP54
Rear material	Plastic	Glass
Frame material	Plastic	Plastic
Colors	Black Gold	Black Gold
Fingerprint scanner	Yes in home button	Yes in-display

Screen-to-body ratio Vivo Y35 83.4% Vivo V25e +2% 84.7%

Performance

Tests of Vivo Y35 and Vivo V25e in the benchmarks

SoC

Chipset	Qualcomm Snapdragon 680	MediaTek Helio G99
Max. clock	2400 MHz	2200 MHz
CPU cores	8 (4 + 4)	8 (2 + 6)
Architecture	- 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53) - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)	- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76
Lithography process	6 nanometers	6 nanometers
Graphics	Adreno 610	Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock	1114 MHz	-

Memory

RAM size	4 8 GB	8 GB
Memory type	LPDDR4X	LPDDR4X
Memory clock	2133 MHz	2133 MHz
Channels	2	2

Storage

Storage size	64 128 256 GB	128 256 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2
Memory card	MicroSD	MicroSD
Memory card max. size	Up to 1024 GB	Up to 1024 GB

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Vivo Y35 377 Vivo V25e +44% 541 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Vivo Y35 1524 Vivo V25e +20% 1823 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Vivo Y35 262681 Vivo V25e +28% 336298

CPU	-	91983
GPU	-	63277
Memory	-	84367
UX	-	94874
Total score	262681	336298

▶️ Submit your AnTuTu result

Software

Operating system	Android 12	Android 12
ROM	Funtouch 12	Funtouch OS 12

Battery

Specifications

Capacity	5000 mAh	4500 mAh
Charge power	44 W	44 W
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Replaceable	No	No
Wireless charging	No	No
Reverse charging	Yes	No
Fast charging	Yes (70% in 34 min)	Yes (58% in 30 min)
Full charging time	0:55 hr	1:05 hr

Camera

Specs and camera test of smartphones

Main camera

Matrix	50 megapixels	64 megapixels
Image resolution	8192 x 6144	9248 x 6920
Zoom	Digital	Digital
Flash	LED	Dual LED
Stabilization	Digital	Optical
8K video recording	No	No
4K video recording	No	No
1080p video recording	Up to 30FPS	Up to 60FPS
Lenses	3 (50 MP + 2 MP + 2 MP)	3 (64 MP + 2 MP + 2 MP)
Wide (main) lens	- 50 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Phase autofocus	- 64 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization
Macro lens	- 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4	- 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4
Depth lens	- 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4	- 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4
Camera features	- Bokeh mode	- Bokeh mode - Pro mode

Selfie camera

Megapixels	16 megapixels	32 megapixels
Image resolution	4608 x 3456	6464 x 4864
Aperture	f/2.0	f/2.0
Sensor type	CMOS	-
Video resolution	1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS	1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)	Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version	5	5.2
Bluetooth features	LE	LE A2DP
USB type	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
USB features	- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG	- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG
GPS	GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo QZSS	GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo QZSS
NFC*	Depends on the region	Yes
Infrared port	No	No

Network

Number of SIM*	2	2
Type of SIM card	Nano	Nano
Multi SIM mode	Standby	Standby
eSIM support*	No	No
Hybrid slot	No	Yes
LTE Cat*	13	-
5G support	No	No

Sound

Speakers	Mono	Mono
Headphone audio jack	Yes	No
FM radio	Yes	-
Dolby Atmos	No	-

Other

Category	Mid-range	Mid-range
Announced	September 2022	August 2022
Release date	September 2022	September 2022
Sensors	- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint	- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint

*Disclaimer! NFC GSM network support and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the display performance camera connectivity and design are more important to you then choose the Vivo V25e. But if the sound is more of a priority – go for the Vivo Y35.

Cast your vote

So which phone would you choose? Vivo Y35 0 (0%) Vivo V25e 0 (0%) Vote Total votes: <, 1

Related comparisons

1. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro vs Vivo Y35 2. Vivo Y33s vs Vivo Y35 3. Oppo A96 vs Vivo Y35 4. Vivo V23e vs Vivo V25e 5. Oppo F21 Pro vs Vivo V25e 6. Vivo V25 vs Vivo V25e

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Send

source nanoreview.net

Vivo gives discounts on its smartphone again - Zing Gadget


Alleged specifications for Vivo s upcoming flagship phone surface


Vivo XPlay 6 Matte Black Edition In Pictures - Classy Black Beauty


Vivo Smartphone with Detachable Flying Camera Revealed in a New Patent


Leak vivo Y70 Reportedly Will Offer 4 500mAh Battery and 8GB RAM IP Tech


vivo V15 Pro Becomes The Fastest Selling Smartphone In vivo History


Vivo V9 Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave


Vivo Smartphone with Detachable Flying Camera Revealed in a New Patent


Android 12 Beta Android Developers


Whatsapp Chat Wallpaper - 222


Roxette suspende su gira por la grave salud de su cantante - LA GACETA


Escalofriantes decapitaciones de presos en c rcel de Brasil - Tucum n a


1170x2532 Wallpaper - 070


Android 12 Inspired Wallpaper - 13


Assertivo - Dicio Dicion rio Online de Portugu s


Beautiful Bedroom Wallpapers 37 - 1920 x 1080

Share On: Facebook Twitter Google+

Samsung Galaxy S21 vs S20 FE 5G

VS Samsung Galaxy S21 Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.2-inch Samsung Galaxy S21 (with Exynos 2100) that was released on January 14 2021 against the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G and came out 4 months before. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.

1. Differences
2. Review
3. Specs
4. Benchmarks
5. Battery life
6. Camera
7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S21

• 18% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (772K versus 653K)
• More recent OS version: Android 13 versus 12
• More energy-efficient CPU – Exynos 2100
• Weighs 21 grams less
• 14% faster in single-core GeekBench 5 test: 1033 and 908 points
• Ready for eSIM technology

Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G

• The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
• Shows 27% longer battery life (32:19 vs 25:31 hours)
• Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
• Has a 0.3 inch larger screen size
• Comes with 500 mAh larger battery capacity: 4500 vs 4000 mAh

Review

Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness Galaxy S21 87 Galaxy S20 FE 5G 84 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Galaxy S21 79 Galaxy S20 FE 5G 72 Battery Battery life charging type and speed Galaxy S21 71 Galaxy S20 FE 5G 82 Camera Photo and video recording quality Galaxy S21 76 Galaxy S20 FE 5G 78 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission Galaxy S21 94 Galaxy S20 FE 5G 89 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Galaxy S21 79 Galaxy S20 FE 5G 78

Value for money

You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Samsung Galaxy S21 Price Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Calculate

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: Galaxy S21 vs Galaxy S20 FE 5G

Display

Type	Dynamic AMOLED	Super AMOLED
Size	6.2 inches	6.5 inches
Resolution	1080 x 2400 pixels	1080 x 2400 pixels
Aspect ratio	20:9	20:9
PPI	421 ppi	407 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Max rated brightness	800 nits	400 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR	-	1200 nits
HDR support	Yes HDR10+	Yes HDR10+
Screen protection	Gorilla Glass Victus	Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Screen-to-body ratio	87.2%	84.8%
Display features	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display

Display tests

RGB color space	99.5%	95.7%
PWM	240 Hz	227 Hz
Response time	5 ms	2.8 ms
Contrast	∞ Infinity	∞ Infinity

Peak brightness test (auto) Galaxy S21 +4% 863 nits Galaxy S20 FE 5G 830 nits Sources: NotebookCheck [3] [4]

Design and build

Height	151.7 mm (5.97 inches)	159.8 mm (6.29 inches)
Width	71.2 mm (2.8 inches)	74.5 mm (2.93 inches)
Thickness	7.9 mm (0.31 inches)	8.4 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight	169 gramm (5.96 oz)	190 gramm (6.7 oz)
Waterproof	IP68	IP68
Rear material	Plastic	Plastic
Frame material	Metal	Metal
Colors	White Gray Pink Purple	White Blue Green Red Orange Purple
Fingerprint scanner	Yes in-display	Yes in-display

Screen-to-body ratio Galaxy S21 +3% 87.2% Galaxy S20 FE 5G 84.8%

Performance

Tests of Samsung Galaxy S21 and Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G in the benchmarks

SoC

Chipset	Samsung Exynos 2100	Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G
Max. clock	2900 MHz	2840 MHz
CPU cores	8 (1 + 3 + 4)	8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture	- 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 3 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A78 - 1 core at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-X1	- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 3 cores at 2.42 GHz: Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77) - 1 core at 2.84 GHz: Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)
L3 cache	-	4 MB
Lithography process	5 nanometers	7 nanometers
Graphics	Mali-G78 MP14	Adreno 650
GPU clock	760 MHz	587 MHz
FLOPS	-	~1228 GFLOPS

Memory

RAM size	8 GB	6 8 GB
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR5
Memory clock	2750 MHz	2750 MHz
Channels	2	2

Storage

Storage size	128 256 GB	128 256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1
Memory card	No	MicroSD
Memory card max. size	-	Up to 1024 GB

Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Galaxy S21 +14% 1033 Galaxy S20 FE 5G 908 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Galaxy S21 3252 Galaxy S20 FE 5G 3261 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Galaxy S21 +18% 772188 Galaxy S20 FE 5G 653858

CPU	203417	185574
GPU	272156	217010
Memory	144766	112445
UX	146598	137783
Total score	772188	653858

3DMark Wild Life Performance Galaxy S21 +46% 5659 Galaxy S20 FE 5G 3865

Stability	66%	91%
Graphics test	33 FPS	23 FPS
Graphics score	5659	3865
PCMark 3.0 score	13812	11811

AnTuTu Results (101st and 169th place) Sources: 3DMark [3] [4] ▶️ Submit your AnTuTu result

Software

Operating system	Android 11 (Can be upgraded to Android 13)	Android 10 (Can be upgraded to Android 12)
ROM	One UI 5.0	One UI 4.1
OS size	28.1 GB	25.6 GB

Battery

Specifications

Capacity	4000 mAh	4500 mAh
Charge power	25 W	25 W
Battery type	Li-Ion	Li-Po
Replaceable	No	No
Wireless charging	Yes (15 W)	Yes (15 W)
Reverse charging	Yes (wireless)	Yes (wireless)
Fast charging	Yes (55% in 50 min)	Yes (37% in 30 min)
Full charging time	1:35 hr	1:35 hr

Battery life tests

Web browsing	07:17 hr	10:12 hr
Watching video	12:26 hr	15:39 hr
Gaming	04:20 hr	04:45 hr
Standby	92 hr	110 hr

General battery life Galaxy S21 25:31 hr Galaxy S20 FE 5G +27% 32:19 hr

Camera

Specs and camera test of smartphones

Main camera

Matrix	12 megapixels	12 megapixels
Image resolution	4000 x 3000	4032 x 3024
Zoom	Optical 1.1x	Optical 3x
Flash	Dual LED	Dual LED
Stabilization	Optical	Optical
8K video recording	Up to 24FPS	No
4K video recording	Up to 60FPS	Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording	Up to 60FPS	Up to 60FPS
Slow motion	960 FPS (720p)	960 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens	120°	123°
Lenses	3 (12 MP + 64 MP + 12 MP)	3 (12 MP + 8 MP + 12 MP)
Wide (main) lens	- 12 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 1.8 micron - Sensor: 1/1.76" Sony IMX555 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) - Optical stabilization	- 12 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 1.8 micron - Sensor: 1/1.76" Sony IMX555 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) - Optical stabilization
Telephoto lens	- 64 MP - Aperture: f/2.0 - Focal length: 28 mm - Pixel size: 0.8 micron - Sensor: 1/1.72" Samsung Bright S5KGW2 (ISOCELL Plus CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) - Optical stabilization	- 8 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 - Focal length: 76 mm - Pixel size: 1 micron - Sensor: 1/4.5" (CMOS) - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization
Ultra-wide lens	- 12 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 13 mm - Pixel size: 1.4 micron - Sensor: 1/2.55" Sony IMX563 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)	- 12 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 13 mm - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/3.0" (CMOS)
Camera features	- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support	- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support
Samples	Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S21 from DxOMark	-

Selfie camera

Megapixels	10 megapixels	32 megapixels
Image resolution	3872 x 2592	6528 x 4896
Aperture	f/2.2	f/2.0
Focal length	26 mm	26 mm
Pixel size	1.22 microns	0.8 microns
Sensor type	CMOS	CMOS
Sensor size	1/3.24"	1/2.74"
Video resolution	2160p (4K) at 60 FPS	2160p (4K) at 60 FPS

DxOMark camera tests

Photo quality Galaxy S21 123 Galaxy S20 FE 5G n/a Video quality Galaxy S21 93 Galaxy S20 FE 5G n/a Generic camera score Galaxy S21 116 Galaxy S20 FE 5G n/a

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)	Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version	5	5
Bluetooth features	LE A2DP	LE A2DP
USB type	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
USB version	3.2	3.2
USB features	- Charging - USB-Storage mode - USB-Host mode - OTG	- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG
GPS	GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo	GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo
NFC*	Yes	Yes
Infrared port	No	No

Network

Number of SIM*	2	2
Type of SIM card	Nano	Nano
Multi SIM mode	Standby	Standby
eSIM support*	Yes	No
Hybrid slot	No	Yes
LTE Cat*	24	20
5G support	Yes	Yes

Sound

Speakers	Stereo	Stereo
Headphone audio jack	No	No
FM radio	No	No
Dolby Atmos	Yes	Yes

Speakers test Max. loudness Galaxy S21 87 dB Galaxy S20 FE 5G +4% 90.1 dB

Other

Category	Flagship	Flagship
Announced	January 2021	September 2020
Release date	February 2021	October 2020
SAR (head)	0.46 W/kg	0.5 W/kg
SAR (body)	1.51 W/kg	1.35 W/kg
Sensors	- Hall-effect sensor - Barometer - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint	- Hall-effect sensor - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint

*Disclaimer! NFC GSM network support and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the performance connectivity and design are more important to you then choose the Samsung Galaxy S21. But if the battery life is more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G.

Cast your vote

So which phone would you choose? Samsung Galaxy S21 46 (10.6%) Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G 387 (89.4%) Vote Total votes: 433

Related comparisons

1. Samsung Galaxy S21 or Apple iPhone 13 2. Samsung Galaxy S21 or S21 FE 5G 3. Samsung Galaxy S21 or Apple iPhone 11 4. Samsung Galaxy S21 or Galaxy A23 5. Samsung Galaxy S21 or Google Pixel 6a 6. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G or S20 FE 7. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G or A52s 5G 8. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G or Google Pixel 6a 9. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G or OnePlus Nord 2T

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Send

source nanoreview.net

Samsung Smartphone Samsung Phone - Samsung One Review Samsung Mobile


Gambar Samsung galaxy 2012 terlengkap - Kumpulan Gambar Terlengkap


Huawei P50 Pro Stock Wallpaper - 08


samsung i7500 samsung galaxy galaxy i7500 samsung i7500 galaxy samsung


Samsung wallpapers - Crazy Frankenstein


iPhone 7 krijgt gewoon weer een Samsung processor - Apparata


vs99-coffee-bokeh-pattern-wallpaper


sf92-blue-gray-gradation-blur - Papers co


Samsung I9000 Galaxy S specs review release date - PhonesData


PAPERS co iPhone wallpaper mw65-lake-calm-tree-mountain-sunny-day


Samsung expects to sell 60 million smartphones in 2011 - Esato


Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite Wallpapers HD


Stylish HD Phone Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave


Samsung


Samsung Galaxy S i9000 Pictures The Tech Next


Samsung Galaxy S I9000 -


Sunrise Phone Wallpaper 1080x2340 - 030


Autumn Season Leaves Car Wallpaper - 1080x2280

Share On: Facebook Twitter Google+