Vivo Y35 vs Vivo V25e
VS 
Vivo Y35 Vivo V25e Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.58-inch Vivo Y35 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 680) that was released on September 15 2022 against the Vivo V25e which is powered by MediaTek Helio G99 and came out 1 month before. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.
- Differences
- Review
- Specs
- Benchmarks
- Battery life
- Camera
- Comments
Key differences
An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Vivo Y35- Comes with 500 mAh larger battery capacity: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Reverse charging feature
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.2)
- Optical image stabilization
- 28% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (336K versus 262K)
- AMOLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
- 44% faster in single-core GeekBench 5 test: 541 and 377 points
Review
Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness Vivo Y35 76 Vivo V25e 83 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Vivo Y35 39 Vivo V25e 49 Battery Battery life charging type and speed Vivo Y35 84 Vivo V25e 80 Camera Photo and video recording quality Vivo Y35 62 Vivo V25e 67 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission Vivo Y35 74 Vivo V25e 79 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Vivo Y35 65 Vivo V25e 69Value for money
You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Vivo Y35 Price Vivo V25e CalculateTests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: Vivo Y35 vs Vivo V25eDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.58 inches | 6.44 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels | 1080 x 2404 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 401 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Max rated brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.4% | 84.7% |
| Display features | - | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Design and build
| Height | 164.3 mm (6.47 inches) | 159.2 mm (6.27 inches) |
| Width | 76.1 mm (3 inches) | 74.2 mm (2.92 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.28 mm (0.33 inches) | 7.79 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 188 gramm (6.63 oz) | 183 gramm (6.46 oz) |
| Waterproof | - | IP54 |
| Rear material | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Black Gold | Black Gold |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes in home button | Yes in-display |
Performance
Tests of Vivo Y35 and Vivo V25e in the benchmarks| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Max. clock | 2400 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53) - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) | - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| GPU clock | 1114 MHz | - |
| RAM size | 4 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 64 128 256 GB | 128 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max. size | Up to 1024 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Vivo Y35 377 Vivo V25e +44% 541 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Vivo Y35 1524 Vivo V25e +20% 1823 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Vivo Y35 262681 Vivo V25e +28% 336298| CPU | - | 91983 |
| GPU | - | 63277 |
| Memory | - | 84367 |
| UX | - | 94874 |
| Total score | 262681 | 336298 |
Software
| Operating system | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| ROM | Funtouch 12 | Funtouch OS 12 |
Battery
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Charge power | 44 W | 44 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (70% in 34 min) | Yes (58% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:55 hr | 1:05 hr |
Camera
Specs and camera test of smartphones| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 64 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 9248 x 6920 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Lenses | 3 (50 MP + 2 MP + 2 MP) | 3 (64 MP + 2 MP + 2 MP) |
| Wide (main) lens | - 50 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Phase autofocus | - 64 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization |
| Macro lens | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 |
| Depth lens | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Megapixels | 16 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6464 x 4864 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor type | CMOS | - |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| GPS | GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo QZSS | GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo QZSS |
| NFC* | Depends on the region | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | Yes |
| LTE Cat* | 13 | - |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Mono |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | Yes | - |
| Dolby Atmos | No | - |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | September 2022 | August 2022 |
| Release date | September 2022 | September 2022 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
Conclusion
If the display performance camera connectivity and design are more important to you then choose the Vivo V25e. But if the sound is more of a priority – go for the Vivo Y35.
Cast your vote
So which phone would you choose? Vivo Y35 0 (0%) Vivo V25e 0 (0%) Vote Total votes: <, 1Related comparisons
1. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro vs Vivo Y35 2. Vivo Y33s vs Vivo Y35 3. Oppo A96 vs Vivo Y35 4. Vivo V23e vs Vivo V25e 5. Oppo F21 Pro vs Vivo V25e 6. Vivo V25 vs Vivo V25eUser opinions
You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Sendsource nanoreview.net
Vivo gives discounts on its smartphone again - Zing Gadget
Alleged specifications for Vivo s upcoming flagship phone surface
Vivo XPlay 6 Matte Black Edition In Pictures - Classy Black Beauty
Vivo Smartphone with Detachable Flying Camera Revealed in a New Patent
Leak vivo Y70 Reportedly Will Offer 4 500mAh Battery and 8GB RAM IP Tech
vivo V15 Pro Becomes The Fastest Selling Smartphone In vivo History
Vivo V9 Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave
Vivo Smartphone with Detachable Flying Camera Revealed in a New Patent
Android 12 Beta Android Developers
Whatsapp Chat Wallpaper - 222
Roxette suspende su gira por la grave salud de su cantante - LA GACETA
Escalofriantes decapitaciones de presos en c rcel de Brasil - Tucum n a
1170x2532 Wallpaper - 070
Android 12 Inspired Wallpaper - 13
Assertivo - Dicio Dicion rio Online de Portugu s
Beautiful Bedroom Wallpapers 37 - 1920 x 1080
